Write a 400- to 500-word initial post that is organized into multiple paragraphs in which you: TO PREPARE · Review the Learning Resources and Course Announcement. · Com

Write a 400- to 500-word initial post that is organized into multiple paragraphs in which you:

TO PREPARE

· Review the Learning Resources and Course Announcement.

· Complete a search online for syllabi in foundational human services courses, which are typically named Introduction to Human Services or Foundations in Human Services. Choose a syllabus.

· Consider the strengths and weaknesses of the syllabus you chose.

· For this Discussion, you should cite the sources you use to support your evaluation. However, APA formatting of those citations will not be assessed as part of your Discussion grade.

BY DAY 4

Write a 
400- to 500-word initial post that is organized into multiple paragraphs in which you:

· Share an overview of your chosen syllabus and provide an attached .doc or .pdf file or link to the original source. Note if the course is in-person, online, or hybrid.

· Evaluate the strengths of the syllabus by pointing out 
at least 4 effective features of the syllabus. Use Learning Resources to support your evaluation.

· Evaluate the weaknesses of the syllabus by pointing out 
at least 2 changes you would make. Explain how these changes would improve the syllabus. Use Learning Resources to support your evaluation.

RESOURCES

The Gannon and Poorvu Center resources explain the basic steps of creating a syllabus. Richmond (2016); Ludy et al. (2016); and Bezzerides et al. (2020) all discuss the role of syllabi in teaching and reaching students. These resources will help with the Discussion and the Week 5 Assignment.

· Gannon, K. (2018, September 12). 

How to create a syllabus: Advice guideLinks to an external site.
. The Chronicle of Higher Education.
https://www.chronicle.com/interactives/advice-syllabus

· Yale Poorvu Center for Teaching and Learning. (n.d.-b) 

Syllabus design
Links to an external site.

.
https://poorvucenter.yale.edu/SyllabusDesign

· Richmond, A. S. (2016, September). 

Constructing a learner-centered syllabus: One professor’s journey: IDEA paper #60Links to an external site.
. IDEA.
https:

It is the first day of class, and what are you discussing? Yes,
the syllabus! You do what you have always done: review
certain elements of the syllabus (e.g., grading policies, due
dates, assignments, and assessments)—all the important
things that you want your students to know. When you
are finished, you might even have a little time left to start
teaching course content. After class, you reflect on how the
first day went, and a few questions surface. You might ask
yourself, What is the purpose of my syllabus? My students
seemed very disengaged today. Why? Now that I think of it,
the syllabus doesn’t match who I am as a teacher. Why not?
Ultimately, you conclude that something must change and
that you need to investigate how to improve your syllabus.

The good news is that there is an increasing amount of
available research on best practices in syllabi construction
(e.g., Altman & Cashin, 1992; Cullen & Harris, 2009;
Grunert, 2000; Slattery & Carlson, 2005). However, more
important, a growing body of research and practice suggests
that learner-centered syllabi can have several positive
impacts on students (e.g., DiClementi & Handelsman, 2005;
Harrington & Gabert-Quillen, 2015; Richmond et al., 2014;
Richmond, Slattery, Morgan, Mitchell, & Becknell, 2016b;
Richmond, Morgan, Slattery, & Venzke, 2013; Saville, Zinn,
Brown, & Marchuk, 2010). Moreover, Cullen and Harris
best define a learner-centered syllabus as “an attempt
to create community, a sharing of power and control over
what is learned and how it is learned as well as a focus
on assessment and evaluation tied directly to learning
outcomes” (p. 117).

However, let’s not get ahead of ourselves. Prior to discussing
the construction of a learner-centered syllabus, it is important
to understand the main purpose of a syllabus as traditionally
researched and practiced and the benefits of a learner-
centered one.

The Purpose of a Syllabus: A Historical Review
The syllabus can take many different forms and serve many
different purposes (Altman & Cashin, 1992; Slattery &
Carlson, n.d., 2005). First, and in some cases foremost, the
syllabus is viewed as a contract (Elberly, Newton, & Wiggins,
2001; Habanek, 2005; Richmond, Boysen, & Gurung, 2016a).
Robinson, Wolf, Czekanski, and Dillon (2014) suggest that
the syllabus defines and establishes the respective duties,
roles, and responsibilities of the students and the teacher.
Contractual syllabus elements may include a description of
and rules regarding plagiarism and academic dishonesty; a
calendar of course events; and policies on grading, exams,
revising and redoing assignments, turning in late work, and
implementing elements of the Americans with Disabilities Act
(Parkes & Harris, 2002; Slattery & Carlson, 2005).

Second, the syllabus is also considered a permanent record
that con

International Journal for the Scholarship of
Teaching and Learning

Volume 10 | Number 2 Article 6

July 2016

Student Impressions of Syllabus Design: Engaging
Versus Contractual Syllabus
Mary-Jon Ludy
Bowling Green State University,
[email protected]

Tim Brackenbury
Bowling Green State University, [email protected]

John Wm Folkins
Bowling Green State University, [email protected]

Susan H. Peet
Bowling Green State University, [email protected]

Stephen J. Langendorfer
Bowling Green State University, [email protected]

See next page for additional authors

Recommended Citation
Ludy, Mary-Jon; Brackenbury, Tim; Folkins, John Wm; Peet, Susan H.; Langendorfer, Stephen J.; and Beining, Kari (2016) “Student
Impressions of Syllabus Design: Engaging Versus Contractual Syllabus,” International Journal for the Scholarship of Teaching and
Learning: Vol. 10: No. 2, Article 6.
Available at: http://digitalcommons.georgiasouthern.edu/ij-sotl/vol10/iss2/6

Syllabus 9/1 (2020): Special Issue Bezzerides et al., “Syllabus as Inclusive Practice”

1

S YLLA B U S A S I N C LUSI V E PR A C T I C E

Julie Bezzerides, Marlowe Daly-Galeano, and Spencer Payton, Lewis-
Clark State College

ARTICLE: SYLLABUS AS INCLUSIVE PRACTICE

Last year, one of our students thanked us for a statement included in the course syllabus that read:
“Regardless of race, color, age, sex, religion, national origin, disability, veteran status, gender identity, or
sexual orientation, you will be treated and respected as a human being.” The student disclosed that her
anxieties about the course dissolved after reading this statement. She reasoned that instructors who
included such a statement would be “fair-minded and approachable” in matters of diversity, grading, and
course communication. A course syllabus has the power to foster an inclusive classroom environment
through carefully selected language and overt statements of inclusive policies, affirming that everyone is
a welcome participant in the class.

A lack of inclusive language in syllabi may potentially exclude students even before class starts, while
intentional, inclusive language reveals that students will be recognized as classroom citizens—active
participants in communal learning—from the start. Failing to directly acknowledge inclusivity may suggest
that individuality is irrelevant. Including language that exhibits awareness of difference is, perhaps, the
least we can do to demonstrate appreciation for diversity in the classroom. An inclusive syllabus
invites students who, historically, have been relegated to the role of passive consumers of syllabus
language and policies, to express their identities and perspectives. Highlighting diversity can open, rather
than close, lines of communication. Like the aforementioned student who expressed gratitude for the
inclusive statement, individuals may become emboldened to request accommodations, express ideas
about course dynamics, and actively engage in their learning. As the result of a single sentence in the
syllabus, that student felt confident to embrace her transgender identity more openly in the class than
she felt she could in other spaces.

Although some campuses dictate inclusive syllabus language by policy, many do not. This means faculty
distribute thousands of syllabi each year that miss the opportunity to establish an inclusive tone, even
though one inclusive statement can transform an individual’s experience. While not a substitution for
holistically inclusive teaching, the syllabus is an essential starting point. Instructors can make their syllabi
more inclusive by affirming students’ rights to share their pronouns, if they so choose, or by including
information about resources for students experiencing difficulties (e.g. counseling services, the Title IX
office, or campus food banks). Instructors




Write a 400- to 500-word initial post that is organized into multiple paragraphs in which you:




TO PREPARE
· Review the Learning Resources and Course Announcement.
· Complete a search online for syllabi in foundational human services courses, which are typically named Introduction to Human Services or Foundations in Human Services. Choose a syllabus.
· Consider the strengths and weaknesses of the syllabus you chose.
· For this Discussion, you should cite the sources you use to support your evaluation. However, APA formatting of those citations will not be assessed as part of your Discussion grade.

BY DAY 4

Write a 
            400- to 500-word initial post that is organized into multiple paragraphs in which you:
        
· Share an overview of your chosen syllabus and provide an attached .doc or .pdf file or link to the original source. Note if the course is in-person, online, or hybrid.
· Evaluate the strengths of the syllabus by pointing out 
            at least 4 effective features of the syllabus. Use Learning Resources to support your evaluation.
        
· Evaluate the weaknesses of the syllabus by pointing out 
            at least 2 changes you would make. Explain how these changes would improve the syllabus. Use Learning Resources to support your evaluation.
        


RESOURCES

The Gannon and Poorvu Center resources explain the basic steps of creating a syllabus. Richmond (2016); Ludy et al. (2016); and Bezzerides et al. (2020) all discuss the role of syllabi in teaching and reaching students. These resources will help with the Discussion and the Week 5 Assignment.
· Gannon, K. (2018, September 12). 
            
How to create a syllabus: Advice guideLinks to an external site.
. The Chronicle of Higher Education.
            https://www.chronicle.com/interactives/advice-syllabus


· Yale Poorvu Center for Teaching and Learning. (n.d.-b) 
            
Syllabus design
                    Links to an external site.

.
            https://poorvucenter.yale.edu/SyllabusDesign


· Richmond, A. S. (2016, September). 
            
Constructing a learner-centered syllabus: One professor’s journey: IDEA paper #60Links to an external site.
. IDEA.
            https:


It is the first day of class, and what are you discussing? Yes,
the syllabus! You do what you have always done: review
certain elements of the syllabus (e.g., grading policies, due
dates, assignments, and assessments)—all the important
things that you want your students to know. When you
are finished, you might even have a little time left to start
teaching course content. After class, you reflect on how the
first day went, and a few questions surface. You might ask
yourself, What is the purpose of my syllabus? My students
seemed very disengaged today. Why? Now that I think of it,
the syllabus doesn’t match who I am as a teacher. Why not?
Ultimately, you conclude that something must change and
that you need to investigate how to improve your syllabus.

The good news is that there is an increasing amount of
available research on best practices in syllabi construction
(e.g., Altman & Cashin, 1992; Cullen & Harris, 2009;
Grunert, 2000; Slattery & Carlson, 2005). However, more
important, a growing body of research and practice suggests
that learner-centered syllabi can have several positive
impacts on students (e.g., DiClementi & Handelsman, 2005;
Harrington & Gabert-Quillen, 2015; Richmond et al., 2014;
Richmond, Slattery, Morgan, Mitchell, & Becknell, 2016b;
Richmond, Morgan, Slattery, & Venzke, 2013; Saville, Zinn,
Brown, & Marchuk, 2010). Moreover, Cullen and Harris
best define a learner-centered syllabus as “an attempt
to create community, a sharing of power and control over
what is learned and how it is learned as well as a focus
on assessment and evaluation tied directly to learning
outcomes” (p. 117).

However, let’s not get ahead of ourselves. Prior to discussing
the construction of a learner-centered syllabus, it is important
to understand the main purpose of a syllabus as traditionally
researched and practiced and the benefits of a learner-
centered one.

The Purpose of a Syllabus: A Historical Review
The syllabus can take many different forms and serve many
different purposes (Altman & Cashin, 1992; Slattery &
Carlson, n.d., 2005). First, and in some cases foremost, the
syllabus is viewed as a contract (Elberly, Newton, & Wiggins,
2001; Habanek, 2005; Richmond, Boysen, & Gurung, 2016a).
Robinson, Wolf, Czekanski, and Dillon (2014) suggest that
the syllabus defines and establishes the respective duties,
roles, and responsibilities of the students and the teacher.
Contractual syllabus elements may include a description of
and rules regarding plagiarism and academic dishonesty; a
calendar of course events; and policies on grading, exams,
revising and redoing assignments, turning in late work, and
implementing elements of the Americans with Disabilities Act
(Parkes & Harris, 2002; Slattery & Carlson, 2005).

Second, the syllabus is also considered a permanent record
that con


International Journal for the Scholarship of
Teaching and Learning

Volume 10 | Number 2 Article 6

July 2016

Student Impressions of Syllabus Design: Engaging
Versus Contractual Syllabus
Mary-Jon Ludy
Bowling Green State University, [email protected]

Tim Brackenbury
Bowling Green State University, [email protected]

John Wm Folkins
Bowling Green State University, [email protected]

Susan H. Peet
Bowling Green State University, [email protected]

Stephen J. Langendorfer
Bowling Green State University, [email protected]

See next page for additional authors

Recommended Citation
Ludy, Mary-Jon; Brackenbury, Tim; Folkins, John Wm; Peet, Susan H.; Langendorfer, Stephen J.; and Beining, Kari (2016) “Student
Impressions of Syllabus Design: Engaging Versus Contractual Syllabus,” International Journal for the Scholarship of Teaching and
Learning: Vol. 10: No. 2, Article 6.
Available at: http://digitalcommons.georgiasouthern.edu/ij-sotl/vol10/iss2/6


http://digitalcommons.georgiasouthern.edu/ij-sotl?utm_source=digitalcommons.georgiasouthern.edu%2Fij-sotl%2Fvol10%2Fiss2%2F6&utm_medium=PDF&utm_campaign=PDFCoverPages


http://digitalcommons.georgiasouthern.edu/ij-sotl?utm_source=digitalcommons.georgiasouthern.edu%2Fij-sotl%2Fvol10%2Fiss2%2F6&utm_medium=PDF&utm_campaign=PDFCoverPages


http://digitalcommons.georgiasouthern.edu/ij-sotl?utm_source=digitalcommons.georgiasouthern.edu%2Fij-sotl%2Fvol10%2Fiss2%2F6&utm_medium=PDF&utm_campaign=PDFCoverPages




Syllabus 9/1 (2020): Special Issue   Bezzerides et al., “Syllabus as Inclusive Practice”

1

S YLLA B U S  A S  I N C LUSI V E  PR A C T I C E

Julie Bezzerides, Marlowe Daly-Galeano, and Spencer Payton, Lewis-
Clark State College

ARTICLE: SYLLABUS AS INCLUSIVE PRACTICE


Last year, one of our students thanked us for a statement included in the course syllabus that read:
“Regardless of race, color, age, sex, religion, national origin, disability, veteran status, gender identity, or
sexual orientation, you will be treated and respected as a human being.” The student disclosed that her
anxieties about the course dissolved after reading this statement. She reasoned that instructors who
included such a statement would be “fair-minded and approachable” in matters of diversity, grading, and
course communication. A course syllabus has the power to foster an inclusive classroom environment
through carefully selected language and overt statements of inclusive policies, affirming that everyone is
a welcome participant in the class. 
A lack of inclusive language in syllabi may potentially exclude students even before class starts, while
intentional, inclusive language reveals that students will be recognized as classroom citizens—active
participants in communal learning—from the start. Failing to directly acknowledge inclusivity may suggest
that individuality is irrelevant. Including language that exhibits awareness of difference is, perhaps, the
least we can do to demonstrate appreciation for diversity in the classroom. An inclusive syllabus
invites students who, historically, have been relegated to the role of passive consumers of syllabus
language and policies, to express their identities and perspectives. Highlighting diversity can open, rather
than close, lines of communication. Like the aforementioned student who expressed gratitude for the
inclusive statement, individuals may become emboldened to request accommodations, express ideas
about course dynamics, and actively engage in their learning. As the result of a single sentence in the
syllabus, that student felt confident to embrace her transgender identity more openly in the class than
she felt she could in other spaces. 
Although some campuses dictate inclusive syllabus language by policy, many do not. This means faculty
distribute thousands of syllabi each year that miss the opportunity to establish an inclusive tone, even
though one inclusive statement can transform an individual’s experience. While not a substitution for
holistically inclusive teaching, the syllabus is an essential starting point. Instructors can make their syllabi
more inclusive by affirming students’ rights to share their pronouns, if they so choose, or by including
information about resources for students experiencing difficulties (e.g. counseling services, the Title IX
office, or campus food banks). Instructors

Why Choose Us

  • 100% non-plagiarized Papers
  • 24/7 /365 Service Available
  • Affordable Prices
  • Any Paper, Urgency, and Subject
  • Will complete your papers in 6 hours
  • On-time Delivery
  • Money-back and Privacy guarantees
  • Unlimited Amendments upon request
  • Satisfaction guarantee

How it Works

  • Click on the “Place Your Order” tab at the top menu or “Order Now” icon at the bottom and a new page will appear with an order form to be filled.
  • Fill in your paper’s requirements in the "PAPER DETAILS" section.
  • Fill in your paper’s academic level, deadline, and the required number of pages from the drop-down menus.
  • Click “CREATE ACCOUNT & SIGN IN” to enter your registration details and get an account with us for record-keeping and then, click on “PROCEED TO CHECKOUT” at the bottom of the page.
  • From there, the payment sections will show, follow the guided payment process and your order will be available for our writing team to work on it.